ghg emissions – Enviro Updates

Op-Ed: Everyone benefits when more people bicycle

May 10, 2026

Eris Weaver, PRESS DEMOCRAT

What would you say if I told you we have a technology that, if more widely deployed, could help solve many of the problems facing us today?

This technology improves physical and mental health. It creates community and is good for the economy. It reduces greenhouse gas emissions. It improves traffic safety and reduces congestion.

It is available to everyone regardless of age, gender, race and economic status, with versions specialized for folks with disabilities. It’s inexpensive and available now — plus it’s fun!

Wouldn’t you say that we need more of that, stat?

Of course, I’m talking about the humble bicycle.

Transportationbicycle infrastructure, bicycle safety, bicycles, ghg emissions

Op-Ed: Never give up! Every ton of carbon we can cut still matters

April 6, 2026

Dan Farber, LEGAL PLANET

It’s easy to be disheartened when we miss climate targets. But climate change isn’t a yes/no thing. It’s a matter of degree.

It’s easy to lose heart about our prospects for limiting climate change. The US has pulled out of international climate negotiations. Most of the countries that joined the Paris Agreement have missed targets , targets that weren’t aggressive enough in the first place. The 1.5° target is already basically out of reach. Is it time to give up on slowing climate change and focus on adapting to it? The answer is no. Here’s why we need to continue the fight to reduce carbon emissions, even in the face of setbacks.

Climate change is a matter of degrees. That sounds like a truism or a pun, but it’s true in a deeper sense. There is no point past which further warming becomes irrelevant. The harm from 3.0°of warming is worse than 2.5°. which is worse than 2.2°, which is worse than 2.0°. And so forth. So even if we were to blow past every temperature target we’ve ever set, every ton of additional carbon dioxide would raise the temperature some fraction of a degree, and every fraction of a degree makes things worse.

Climate Change & Energyclimate action, ghg emissions, ghg reduction

Sonoma County sets sights on carbon-neutral government by 2030

September 23, 2025

Emma Murphy, PRESS DEMOCRAT

Sonoma County officials have their eyes set on an ambitious goal — to make the county carbon-neutral by 2030, starting with government operations.

A new 167-page plan spells out how the county intends to reach that goal via 54 projects tackling energy use, emissions, waste and carbon sequestration. Of those projects, the county’s Climate Action and Resiliency Division has recommended starting with 25 measures over the next two years, with an estimated price tag of $38 million.

The plan is meant as a blueprint to achieve carbon neutrality by 2030, a goal the Board of Supervisors established in 2021 as part of its five-year strategic plan. Reaching that goal means the county would have to account for all of its greenhouse gas production and offset that output by local and other means to achieve a net neutral impact on the emissions driving climate change.

In the past three years, the county’s climate division has audited the county’s energy use, waste production and overall greenhouse gas inventory, resulting in the action plan approved Sept. 10 by the Board of Supervisors.

Climate Change & Energycarbon-neutral, Climate Action Plan, energy, ghg emissions, ghg emissions inventories, greenhouse gases

Santa Rosa acquires new electric transit buses, readying first two for service in late 2022

September 29, 2022

Alana Minkler & Colin Atagi, THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Two electric buses arrived in Santa Rosa on Wednesday morning and two more are on the way as the city is poised to put them into service later this year — the start of a bigger shift to eliminate carbon emissions tied to the CityBus fleet.

The switch to electrical buses is part of the city’s initiative to make public transportation fully zero-emission by 2030 and drastically lower carbon emissions in the transportation sector, which accounts for 60% of climate warming gases in the county.

The city’s all-electric buses, which cost $1.2 million each, join three currently in the county fleet, and are part of the broader plan by transit and fleet managers eyeing a transition away from fossil fuel vehicles over the coming years.

Sonoma County Transit introduced its first electric bus in 2018 and plans to add three more by the end of this year, with up to 19 in service by mid-2024, said Sonoma County Transit Systems Manager Bryan Albee said.

Climate Change & Energy, Transportationelectric vehicles, ghg emissions, ghg reduction, public transit

County of Sonoma to take inventory of greenhouse gas emissions for all county operations

August 9, 2022

Press Release, COUNTY OF SONOMA

The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors today authorized the creation of an inventory of greenhouse gas emissions from all county government facilities and operations. The inventory will be used as a baseline to help the county move toward its goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2030, as outlined in the county’s Five-Year Strategic Plan for Climate Action and Resiliency.

Following a competitive bid process, the board today approved the selection of Oakland-based Cascadia Consulting Group, Inc. to perform the greenhouse gas audit with a contract amount of $142,330.

“This board has made the climate crisis a top priority by joining cities, counties, and countries around the world in declaring a climate emergency and making a $10 million commitment to action on adaptation and resiliency strategies,” said James Gore, chair of the Board of Supervisors. “We are already making progress on carbon accounting of internal operations, but we have ambitious goals and more work to do. A baseline understanding of our current impact is essential to meeting the 2030 targets with accuracy and efficiency.”

The Board of Supervisors previously allocated $500,000 as part of Strategic Plan funding to conduct both an internal municipal greenhouse gas emissions inventory and a study evaluating the potential of carbon sequestration. The carbon sequestration study will be pursued at a later date.

Cascadia Consulting Group, Inc. works with public, corporate, nonprofit, and tribal clients on strategic planning, analysis, and management of projects focused on climate change mitigation and resilience, energy efficiency and renewable energy, recycling and materials management, and resource conservation.

Under the terms of the contract, Cascadia will prepare the emissions inventory using the Local Government Operations Protocol for the Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories, which is based on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, considered the world’s most widely used corporate accounting and reporting standard for greenhouse gas emissions.
…

County of Sonoma to take inventory of greenhouse gas emissions for all county operationsRead More »

Climate Change & Energyghg emissions, ghg emissions inventories

Climate controversy: California’s plan for handling crisis is flawed, advisors say

June 5, 2022

Nadia Lopez, CALMATTERS

California’s climate change plan fails to provide substantial evidence that capturing carbon will meet ambitious greenhouse gas goals, critics say. The plan “does California a disservice,” one state advisor said.

As California races to prevent the irreversible effects of climate change, some experts are questioning key policies that the state is counting on to meet its ambitious goals and accusing state officials of failing to provide substantial details to back up its claims.

The California Air Resources Board’s proposal, called a scoping plan, outlines policies that would transition the economy away from fossil fuels. The purpose of the plan is to fulfill state mandates to reduce planet-warming emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2045.

In this year’s highly-anticipated climate policy blueprint, some critics say the state agency has not been transparent on how it plans to achieve its goals. The process has left legislators and others at the forefront of the climate discussion confused over the air board staff’s projections.

“The draft scoping plan does California a disservice,” said Danny Cullenward, an economist and vice chair of the Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee, a group of five experts appointed by the governor and top legislators to assess the effectiveness of the state’s landmark cap and trade program. “It focuses on long-term goals at the expense of near-term action.”

At two recent state committee meetings, environmentalists, academics and climate policy experts who serve on state advisory panels voiced concerns over California’s approach to tackling the climate crisis. They called the plan incomplete, ambiguous and confusing.

Climate Change & EnergyCARB, carbon capture, emissions reduction, fossil fuels, ghg emissions, renewable energy

Op Ed: California can do better than carbon neutrality by 2045

May 22, 2022

Daniel Kammen, THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Ten years ago, many Californians could not have imagined the climate nightmare we are living today — dark orange skies during wildfire season, heat waves in the dead of winter, mandatory water restrictions amid crippling drought.

Without urgent action, we may well look back on this moment as the calm before the storm. Over the course of the next decade, California’s biggest climate challenges — hotter summers, a shorter rainy season and more destructive wildfires — could double in intensity.

It’s against this backdrop that the California Air Resources Board last week released a draft of our state’s scoping plan, a blueprint for combating climate change that will guide California’s policy for years. Despite the stakes for Californians, and although my research indicates the state could actually become carbon negative by 2030, the draft proposal would delay reaching carbon neutral until 2045. The barriers to a target of 2030 are political, not technical.

The draft plan calls for investment in new fossil fuel electricity resources, and it relies on unproven and costly carbon capture technologies that would lock in fossil fuel pollution. Adopting this approach would be lazy, nonsensical and racially unjust. During the current 45-day period for public review of the plan, California has the chance to choose a smarter path.

Renewable energy, even when coupled with energy storage, is cheaper than fossil fuels. California’s own state laws say that renewable energy must be prioritized before building out expensive and polluting gas power plants. Instead, California must set ambitious targets that immediately cut pollution through no-regrets strategies.

Climate Change & Energycarbon capture, fossil fuels, ghg emissions, ghg reduction, renewable energy